Russian–Manchu border conflicts

Russian-Manchu border conflicts

Qing Empire forces storming the fort of Albazin
Date 1652 - 1689
Location Heilongjiang and Priamurye
Result Qing Victory
Treaty of Nerchinsk
Belligerents
Qing Empire
Joseon Dynasty
Tsardom of Russia
Cossacks
Commanders and leaders
Qing:
Haise (海色)
Xifu (希福)
Minggadari(明安达理)
Sarhuda
Joseon:
Byeon Geup
Shin Ryu
Yerofey Khabarov
Onufriy Stepanov
Afanasy Pashkov
Alexei Tolbuzin
Afanasy Beiton
Strength
Qing:
15,000 men[1]
Joseon:
~400 men
2,000 men[1]
Casualties and losses
Qing:
several hundreds (debated)
Joseon:
~40 men
~800 men[2]

The Russian–Manchu border conflicts (1652–1689) were a series of intermittent skirmishes between the Manchus and the Cossacks in which the Cossacks tried and failed to gain the land north of the Amur River. The hostilities culminated in the Manchu siege of the Cossack fort of Albazin (1686) and resulted in the Treaty of Nerchinsk, concluded between the Russia and the Qing Empire in 1689.

Contents

Background

This article concerns the southeast corner of Siberia south of the Stanovoy Mountains which was twice contested between Russia and China. Hydrologically, the Stanovoy Mountains separate the rivers that flow north into the Arctic from those that flow south into the Amur River. Ecologically, the area is the southeastern edge of the Siberian boreal forest with some areas good for agriculture. Socially and politically, from about 600 AD, it was the northern fringe of the Chinese-Korean-Manchu world. Various Chinese, Korean and Manchu-like states would claim sovereignty, build forts and collect tribute when they were strong enough. There were posts at Haishenwai(Vladivostok), Boli(Khabarovsk), Deren on the lower Amur and Tyr above Nikolaevsk-on-Amur. From 698 to 926 the Korean kingdom of Balhae ruled part of the area from an administrative center at Shuaibinbu (Ussuriisk). Tributary delegations from Kuyedao

In 1643 russian adventurers spilled over the Stanovoys, but by 1689 they were driven back by the Manchus. In 1859/60 the area was annexed by Russia and quickly filled up with a Russian population.

The Qing Perspective

1639-1643 : Campaign led by Manchus against the indigenous rulers of the region

1643-1644 : Vasili Poyarkov

1649-1653 : Yerofey Khabarov

1654-1658 : Onufriy Stepanov

1654-1658 : The Manchu-Korean alliances expeditions against Russians

In the following operations significant Korean forces were included into Manchu-led troops. The campaigns became known in Korean historiography as Naseon Jeongbeol.

1685-1687 : The Albazin/Yakesa Campaign

see also Outer Manchuria

Russian Point of View

This section retells the story from the Russian side (or rather from a Western reading of Russian sources). The sources, for the most part are Forsyth[5] Lincoln[6] and March.[7]

Russian expansion into Siberia began with the conquest of the Khanate of Sibir in 1582. By 1643 they reached the Pacific at Okhotsk. East of the Yenisei River there was little land fit for agriculture, except Dauria, the land between the Stanovoy Mountains and the Amur River which was nominally subject to the Manchus. The Manchus had recently reestablished their authority in the area and were just beginning their conquest of China (Qing Dynasty). The land was populated by some 9,000 Daurs on the Zeya River, 14,000 Duchers downstream and several thousand Tungus and Nivkhs toward the river mouth. The first Russians to hear of Dauria were probably Ivan Moskvitin and Maxim Perfilev about 1640.

1643-46:Poyarkov: In 1643 Vassili Poyarkov traveled from Yakutsk south to the Zeya River. He then sailed down the Amur River to its mouth and then north along the Okhotsk coast, returning to Yakutsk three years later.

1649-50: Khabarov: In 1649 Yerofei Khabarov found a better route to the upper Amur and quickly returned to Yakutsk where he recommended that a larger force be sent to conquer the region.

1650-53 Khabarov again: He returned the same year and built winter quarters at Albazin at the northernmost point on the river. Next summer he sailed down the Amur and built a fort at Achansk (Wuzhala (乌扎拉)) probably near present-day Khabarovsk. Again there was fighting and the natives called in their Manchu overlords. On 24 March 1652, Achansk was unsuccessfully attacked by a large Qing force [600 Manchu soldiers from Ninguta and about 1500 Daurs and Duchers led by the Manchu general known as Haise (海色),[8] or Izenei (Изеней or Исиней).[9] Haise was later executed for his poor performance.[10]]. As soon as the ice broke up Khabarov withdrew upriver[11] and built winter quarters at Kumarsk. In the spring of 1653 reinforcements arrived under Dmitry Zinoviev. The two quarreled, Khabarov was arrested and escorted to Moscow for investigation.

1653-58:Stepanov: Onufriy Stepanov was left in charge with about 400-500 men. They had little difficulty plundering the natives and defeating the local Qing troops. The Qing responded with two policies. First they ordered the local population to withdraw, thereby ending the grain production that had attracted the Russians in the first place. Second they appointed the experienced general Sarhuda (who himself was from the Nierbo village from the mouth of Sungari) as the garrison commander at Ninguta. In 1657 he built more than 40 ships at the village of Ula (modern Jilin).. In 1658 a large Qing fleet under Sarhuda caught up with Stepanov and killed him and about 220 Cossacks. A few escaped and became freebooters.

1658-65:No man's land: By 1658 the Chinese had wiped out the Russians below Nerchinsk and the deserted land became a haven for outlaws and renegade Cossacks. In 1660 a large band of Russians was destroyed. They had some difficulty pursuing the Cossacks since their own policy had removed most of the local food. In the 1670s the Chinese attempted to drive the Russians away from the Okhotsk coast, reaching as far north as the Maya River.

1665-1689:Albazin: In 1665 Nikifor Chernigovsky murdered[12] the voyvoda of Ilimsk and fled to the Amur and reoccupied the fort at Albazin, which became the center of an unofficial colony. In 1670 it was unsuccessfully attacked. In 1672 Albazin received the Czar's pardon and was officially recognized. From 1673 to 1683 Manchu forces were tied up suppressing a rebellion in the south. In 1682 or 1684 a voyvoda was appointed by Moscow. In 1685 the Manchus, now freed from their wars, invested the fort which surrendered on liberal terms. Most of the Russians withdrew to Nerchinsk, but a few joined the Manchus, becoming the Albazin Cossacks at Peking. The Chinese withdrew from the area, but the Russians, hearing of this, returned with 800 men under Aleksei Tolbuzin and reoccupied the fort. (their original purpose was merely to harvest the local grain, a rare commodity in this part of Siberia.) From June 1686, the fort was again besieged. Either (the siege was raised in December when it was learned that the two empires were engaged in peace negotiations[13]) or (the fort was captured after an 18 month siege and Tolbuzin killed[14]). At that time less than 100 defenders were left alive.

Treaties

In 1689, by the Treaty of Nerchinsk, the Russians abandoned the whole Amur country including Albazin. The frontier was established as the Argun River and the Stanovoy Mountains. In 1727 the Treaty of Kyakhta confirmed and clarified this border and regulated Russo-Chinese trade.

In 1858, almost two centuries after the fall of Albazin, by the Treaty of Aigun, Russia annexed the land between the Stanovoy Mountains and the Amur (commonly referred to in Russian as Priamurye, i.e. the "Lands along the Amur"). In 1860, with the Convention of Beijing, Russia annexed the Primorye (i.e. the "Martitme Region") down to Vladivostok, an area that had not been in contention in the 17th century. See Amur Annexation.

References and Bibliography

  1. ^ a b CJ. Peers, Late Imperial Chinese Armies 1520-1840, 33
  2. ^ China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia By Peter C. Perdue Published by Harvard University Press, 2005
  3. ^ А.М.Пастухов (A.M. Pastukhov) К вопросу о характере укреплений поселков приамурских племен середины XVII века и значении нанайского термина «гасян» (Regarding the fortification techniques used in the settlements of the Amur Valley tribes in the mid-17th century, and the meaning of the Nanai word "гасян" (gasyan)) (Russian)
  4. ^ A.M. Pastukhov, "Корейская пехотная тактика самсу в XVII веке и проблема участия корейских войск в Амурских походах маньчжурской армии " (Korean infantry tactic samsu (三手) in the 17th century, and the issues related to the Korean troops' participation in the Manchus' Amur campaigns) (Russian)
  5. ^ Forsyth, James (1994). A History of the Peoples of Siberia: Russia's North Asian Colony 1581-1990. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521477719. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=nzhq85nPrdsC. 
  6. ^ Lincoln, W. Bruce (2007 (earlier edition, 1994)). The Conquest of a Continent: Siberia and the Russians. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0801489229. http://books.google.com/books?id=a7JrTvgU4yMC. 
  7. ^ G. Patrick March, Eastern Destiny: the Russians in Asia and the North Pacific, 1996
  8. ^ Gong, Shuduo; Liu, Delin (2007). 图说清. 知書房出版集團. p. 66. ISBN 986715164X. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=5XzTXqTwECcC.  (Although this particular book seems to misspell 海色 as 海包 (Haibao))
  9. ^ Август 1652 г. Из отписки приказного человека Е.П. Хабарова якутскому воеводе Д.А. Францбекову о походе по р. Амуру. An excerpt from Khabarov's report to the Yakutsk Voivode D.A.Frantsbekov, August 1652.) (Russian)
  10. ^ Hummel, Arthur William (1970). Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing period (1644-1912), vol. 2. Ch'eng Wen Publishing Co.. p. 632. http://books.google.com.au/books?id=Hs8LhXwRqPgC. "Haise was executed for this disgrace"  "SARHUDA" article.
  11. ^ Оксана ГАЙНУТДИНОВА (Oksana Gainutdinova) Загадка Ачанского городка (The mystery of Fort Achansk)
  12. ^ Ravenstein, The Russians on the Amur, 1860(sic), Google Books
  13. ^ March, chapter 5
  14. ^ John J. Stephen, The Russian Far East, 1994,page 31

1. Page 133 -152 China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia By Peter C. Perdue Published by Harvard University Press, 2005